?

Log in

No account? Create an account
 
 
15 November 2014 @ 10:45 am
zerohedge.com: Добыча и цена нефти  
09.11.2014 Oil Price Slide – No Good Way Out http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-09/oil-price-slide-%E2%80%93-no-good-way-out
http://ourfiniteworld.com/2014/11/05/oil-price-slide-no-good-way-out/


Saudi oil production, consumption and exports based on EIA data.


Estimate of OPEC break-even oil prices, including tax requirements by parent countries, from APICORP


Selected figures from SEC filings by Continental Resources.

- - - - - - -

08.11.2014 The Detailed US Shale Oil Cost Curve: Where Is The Line In The Sand? http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-08/detailed-us-shale-oil-cost-curve-where-line-sand





On an almost daily basis, investors are reassured that a falling oil price is "unequivocally good" for the US economy. The "It's like a tax cut for the consumer"-meme dominates financial media while the impact on the Shale (or tight) oil industry is shrugged off blindly with "well breakevens are low, right?" As Barclays shows in the chart below, the breakeven price for oil to shut-in tight-oil supply varies by region (and corporation) adding that at $80/b WTI, most producers will sweat it out. But, they warn, if prices remain at these levels through 2015, it could compromise the significant potential new volumes that are needed to offset declines from existing wells. This new, higher-breakeven volume is small in 2015, but becomes much larger in 2016 (with a 17-25% plunge in earnings which would drastically reduce capex... and thus The US Economy).

As Barclays notes,

As oil prices continue to fall, we review the likely supply response of tight oil supplies. Admittedly, cost of supply curves do not tell the whole story about where prices might bottom. At $80/b WTI, we think most producers will sweat it out and achieve their stated production objectives in 2015. But if prices remain at these levelsthrough 2015, it could compromise the significant potential new volumes that are needed to offset declines from existing wells. This new, higher-breakeven volume is small in 2015, but becomes much larger in 2016.

s we stated in the most recent Blue Drum, we expect a rebound in prices in 2H15. But, if prices do remain lower and fall to $70 for all of 2015, half of proven and probable (2P) remaining US tight oil reserves would be challenged. The near-term (6-month) effect would be marginal, but fewer new volumes would be added in 2H15 and in 2016. On a net basis, that implies a reduction to growth of about 100 kb/d for 2015 as a whole. A growth impact of 100 kb/d is a drop in the bucket in the context of total non-OPEC growth of around 1.5 mb/d. Thus, we expect downward price pressure to mount unless OPEC supplies less or demand rebounds.

At $70/bbl, 80% of the 2.8 mb/d of new tight oil volumes by 2017 (not including declines) would be produced (meaning 800 kb/d from new drilling, a reduction of 200 kb/d over the next three years), according to WoodMackenzie.

There are three reasons to be cautious with how cost curves are used.

First, WoodMac’s ‘half-cycle’ cost curve (above) represents new production only at a well, rather than at a project, level. Companies use ‘full-cycle’ economics (which include other expenses) to assess the economic viability of new drilling projects.

Second, cost curves do not address how existing production might react. For this, we turn to EIA’s Annual Energy Outlook. EIA scenarios which imply that if prices reach and stay at $70/bbl, annual growth of 630 kb/d by 2017 would be cut by 180 kb/d each year, net of declines.

Third, expected improvement in service costs will be another important determinant for the breakeven price of tight oil supplies. Oilfield services sector cost inflation has plateaued and stands to improve further in the coming years. This means that the cost curve in a year is likely to be up to $5/b lower on average. Permian D&C costs have declined from $9-10mn in 2012 to $5-7mn today.

OPEC producers have low production costs (in Saudi Arabia, even as low as $4/bbl), but will feel the heat fiscally. Still, tight oil producers are likely to be first affected in a low price environment.

Companies are likely to react very differently regarding their market capitalization, hedge ratio, and ‘oiliness’ of output. We estimate that small and mid-cap E&Ps(accounting for 880 kb/d oil and NGLs) would see earnings cut by 17% in 2015 at $80 and by 25% at $70/b, which would likely lead to a cut to capex and drilling plans in 2015. Adding production from infill drilling, drilling in new areas, and enhancing recovery rates from existing wells would add output but require different levels of capex. Wells already online would not be affected, in our view.


- - - - - - -

06.11.2014 Saudi Cut In Oil Price For US May Lead To Price War http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-06/saudi-cut-oil-price-us-may-lead-price-war

- - - - - - -

06.11.2014 "Saudis Have Good Reason To Be Concerned" Warns Ex-CIA Officer, As ISIS Enters World's Largest Oil Exporter http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-11-06/saudis-have-good-reason-be-concerned-warns-ex-cia-officer-isis-enters-worlds-largest
 
 
 
Искандер ЧинаевИскандер Чинаев on November 15th, 2014 03:58 pm (UTC)
Судя по drilling report, сланцы тормозить не хотят. Очередные +100 тысяч баррелей сутки,ожидаются в декабре.
iv_g on November 15th, 2014 06:05 pm (UTC)
У больших систем большая инерционность.
У добычи как минимум квартал, если не полугодие.
vladimir690vladimir690 on November 16th, 2014 03:22 pm (UTC)
Подумалось
Когда говорят о сланцевой нефтедобыче в США все время говорят ,что это дело очень дорогое (не менее $200 млрд в год) и это действительно так ,по крайней мере в масштабе мировой нефтянки
http://www.nefttrans.ru/news/ssha-stali-krupneyshim-proizvoditelem-nefti-v-mire-po-itogam-i-polugodiya.html

Но для самих США это всего чуть более 1 % от их ВВП.На ту же армию тратят почти в 3 раза больше
http://www.kp.ru/daily/26189/3078148/

Выходит,что они относительно в "шоколаде" хоть и поддерживают свою нефтянку сверхнизкими процентными ставками .Или может все таки нет т.к не учли все расходы (капитальные и операционные затраты и т.д.)?



iv_g on November 16th, 2014 04:09 pm (UTC)
Re: Подумалось
Я уже многократно писал:
i/ сланцевые залежи находятся в пределах традиционных нефтегазоносных бассейнов, где все исследовано, разбурено, есть вся инфраструктура для транспортировки.
ii/ собственно главные затраты текущие: бурение и гидроразрывы (ГРП).
На бурение большие налоговые вычеты и кажется на ГРП
iii/ Дешевый кредит с возможностью перекредитоваться или создать СП с иностранцами или продать активы
iv/ Из большинства скважин извлекают все 3 компонента: нефть, газ, конденсмат
До последних 2 недель на рынке США действовало почти правило: цены на газ вниз, на нефть вверх, что позволяло компенсировать
плохую цену по одному УВ ростом цены на другой.
Искандер ЧинаевИскандер Чинаев on November 17th, 2014 07:26 am (UTC)
Re: Подумалось
iv-g здравствуйте,а у вас нет материалов по канадским пескам и в целом по канадской добыче.
iv_g on November 17th, 2014 01:52 pm (UTC)
Re: Подумалось
10 Октябрь 2014 iv_g: записи о Канаде http://iv-g.livejournal.com/1100448.html